[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Xen-users] disk backend performance


  • To: 'Xen Users' <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Joseph L. Casale" <JCasale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 09:56:33 -0700
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Acceptlanguage: en-US
  • Delivery-date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 08:57:13 -0800
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AclRb6nfwYpRqs+ATr6AZN/ypRumTAAAZKcgAACSjRAAATjEoAAANmvg
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-users] disk backend performance

>My system disk is a raid 5 array, 800 GB, so it has plenty of throughput.
>But you say that any technique even NFS or even SAMBA, versos creating a
>file and sharing it via AOE will be comparable?
>Which technique would you pick? I have a back-to-back 1 GB Ethernet cable
>between the two servers.

Well,
Given that you're still using one array for everything, I would just use
whatever is most convenient. Although AoE has some apparent advantages, I am
not a fan as it lacks the security that iSCSI has native. I would probably
export an NFS directory or use iSCSI and export a file using fileio mode.

OTOH, your network between the two is pretty secure :) Use AoE...

I wouldn't even consider Samba, why muddy the waters sharing data between Linux
hosts emulating a non native Linux protocol. That's just silly?

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.