[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] Which version for hosting?

  • To: Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: Ian Murray <murrayie@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 10:35:51 +0000 (GMT)
  • Cc:
  • Delivery-date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 02:36:57 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=qq/QYkff01ZCtbZotizKXR9TSFdbqgwODcp6lpCz52GQwmsIE7iDylWuKqeOAPKk7aW+f2qTl1bf+5sv8ebEjVvPCmy9i6vzi2Cz8yycMbN/70vFeG9zYaPhd5nNYm26WUTEnlFX+SrzN10UbDkbBovM3151V2+7XGFPDcDu810=;
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

> In general Xen 4.0 works with 2.6.18 based  dom0 kernel aswell.
> Try it and see how it goes with the el5 kernel  :)
> I know gitco.de guys had some problems with the el5 dom0  kernel,
> but those might be already resolved.

I had problems with xendomains failing to save and restore domains on 
startup/shutdown using 4.0 and the Gitco 2.6.18. Other than that, it seemed 
alright. I reverted back to 3.4.3 because xendomains would fail to restore and 
fail to auto-start them, as they were left in a broken state after the 
restore. Xen 3.4.3 + CentOS's 2.6.18 was a rock solid combination, 

Good luck getting pv_ops +4.0.1 reliably working on CentOS 5.5. So 
far, it has been quite problematic for me.

Xen-users mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.