[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] Xen PVHVM DomU's hdX+xvdX redundancy 'confusing' to guests OS's isntaller. An OS, or Xen, issue?
On 03/01/2016 01:32 PM, PGNet Dev wrote: > On 03/01/2016 01:05 PM, Sarah Newman wrote: >> What happens if you drop "hdtype = 'ahci'" from the config file? > > Unclear. Iirc, it was necessary to getting these PVHVM clients to work; > though, at this stage of futzing about, I'd be hard-pressed for the details > ... I'll give it a try. My config files do not have hdtype, device_model_version, or bios. They have device names of 'hd'. With a CentOS 6 Xen4CentOS 3.18 domU, the kernel only exposes the xen blockfront device. From http://xenbits.xen.org/docs/unstable/misc/vbd-interface.txt "For Linux HVM guests using PV-on-HVM drivers, users are recommended to supply as few hd* devices as possible, and for the rest of the disks, to use pure xvd* devices starting at xvde. Modern PV-on-HVM drivers will map provided hd* devices to the corresponding /dev/xvd* (for example, hda is presented also as /dev/xvda)." I think that you will need at least one non paravirtualized disk if you intend to use a bootloader. _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |