[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-users] Plans to require CPU VT flag?


  • To: "xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Christopher Myers <cmyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 21:58:50 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=cmyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx;
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 21:59:59 +0000
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xenproject.org>
  • Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
  • Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
  • Thread-index: AQHTeRSNKP9UdV/vDE6uhVChT9j1MQ==
  • Thread-topic: Plans to require CPU VT flag?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Out of curiosity, are there any plans to *require* the VT CPU flag in
Xen at any point in the foreseeable future? The reason I ask is because
my server at home doesn't support them, so I want to beware of any
version that would break my current setup.

Right now I've got four PV VMs running on my Xen box (4.8.3 on Debian
Stretch,) and am perfectly content with its performance :)

Thanks!

Chris
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEE7GM/Dul8WSWn72odQ1nEo4DFCIUFAlo5i5QACgkQQ1nEo4DF
CIXrPwf9Gk9BlGLnyn2Yn+lWxIfrDJQZhzlAagr4/6VBC9IYM6KfD1WNqpAYT639
bIUVx6Rv//yqV116VYCWPuHcGau67pZk9NXVebu9VVI7m388BCt6U2CDWEjOBv7m
zJpEZBC0QoYeyhAOTWKv8e8NlQ3NrYEVH2aR/LGH93b+0R2dWKXhPS10EdsU6xBV
q43CHbcidsPYFJGM9mXos/HDzZffTwb9CH0sZlBc115Vj9O7NlFStfzX4nhdjQzG
m0WcUK6Y/MDTTd0hGtkci2QntKZbEUgWZex+oQebnZ50Utt607BiprUyhmXQbYzE
1/hFixx/hMG/9v3An8kIPl6TocJEPw==
=1EEJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-users

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.