Re: [MirageOS-devel] vchan/xenstore in Qubes r3

[Richard Mortier <Richard.Mortier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 21 Jun 2014, at 15:56, Anil Madhavapeddy <anil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Not using a big Xenstore and shifting to a process-per-VM is also the model 
> that Bromium's vSentry adopts for their microvirtualization, if I remember 
> Ian's XenSummit talk right.

fwiw, my understanding of his seminar at notts was that it's approximately a vm 
per process but not quite as clear cut as that. (really a vm per "task" which 
is defined based on a relatively small set of simple policies for the 
enterprise context but may include multiple processes.)

-- 
Cheers,

R.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

_______________________________________________
MirageOS-devel mailing list
MirageOS-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mirageos-devel