Re: [Publicity] Blog post: interview with Gentoo pkg maintainer

[Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On ven, 2014-01-10 at 14:02 +0000, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
> On 10 Jan 2014, at 13:58, Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > OTOH, some other points are valid (despite being put in a very direct
> > form), and not that different from what we got from other maintainers.
> > For those points, I think it's important to show that we valued the
> > feedback and that we're down to try to improve the situation... That's
> > what I tried to do in the introduction (and I can try to make this more
> > evident there, if you think that's needed).
> 
> I think that's a great attitude to have, particularly given the rocky
> history of Xen packages through the years.  
>
Indeed.

> Perhaps a short editor note
> at the end rather as well, with what we're doing to address some the
> upstream concerns might be appropriate, to end the interview on a
> positive note?
> 
Mmm... I think I like that. Lemme try.

Thanks and Regards,
Dario

-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity