|
On 06/16/2014 09:52 AM, George Dunlap
wrote:
On
06/13/2014 03:17 PM, Lars Kurth wrote:
On 13/06/2014 15:00, Dario Faggioli wrote:
On gio, 2014-06-12 at 11:43 +0100, Anil
Madhavapeddy wrote:
On 12 Jun 2014, at 11:40, George
Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 06/12/2014 08:39 AM, Dario
Faggioli wrote:
Indeed. I just read it, and it's
really a great post.
Perhaps... Adding a picture (a generic one, don't have
anything
particular in mind) somewhere? But not that important.
You mean something like one of these?
https://www.flickr.com/photos/nogood/2190795248
...
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kevinl8888/119712943
I like these, in particlar the first one, but I am not 100% sure
whether we can use them (non-commercial use only)
Isn't xenproject.org a non-profit? Or a not-for-profit?
"
A commercial use is one primarily intended for
commercial advantage or monetary compensation."
We're certainly not getting any monetary compensation. And the
purpose of this blog post is to help people understand something
about the development process in general -- we're not even really
promoting Xen over KVM or anything like that. I don't even think
promoting Xen as an open-source project would be "for commercial
advantage"; but I completely fail to see how explaining principles
of development could be "for commercial advantage".
-George
|
