[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Publicity] Draft blog on release management principles
On 16/06/2014 09:52, George Dunlap wrote: Yes we are non-profit, but non-profit != non-commercial in a CC context and I always err on the side of caution. The reason is that CC's NonCommercial (NC) licenses prohibit uses that are "primarily intended for or directed toward commercial advantage or monetary compensation." ... you could argue that the web presence of every open source project is directed toward increasing the market share of that project and that any content published is thus "directed towards commercial advantage".On 06/13/2014 03:17 PM, Lars Kurth wrote:On 13/06/2014 15:00, Dario Faggioli wrote:On gio, 2014-06-12 at 11:43 +0100, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:On 12 Jun 2014, at 11:40, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On 06/12/2014 08:39 AM, Dario Faggioli wrote:Indeed. I just read it, and it's really a great post. Perhaps... Adding a picture (a generic one, don't have anything particular in mind) somewhere? But not that important.You mean something like one of these? https://www.flickr.com/photos/nogood/2190795248 ... https://www.flickr.com/photos/kevinl8888/119712943I like these, in particlar the first one, but I am not 100% sure whether we can use them (non-commercial use only)Isn't xenproject.org a non-profit? Or a not-for-profit? http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Frequently_Asked_Questions#Does_my_use_violate_the_NonCommercial_clause_of_the_licenses.3F Regards Lars _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |