[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] common gdb stub


  • To: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Kip Macy <kip.macy@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 12:02:00 -0700
  • Cc: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 19:02:06 +0000
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=tmdgxQ3ZqY996yuAlrw+xKeeSlECm591FjSYcfwXd1dDFWCii4E8vmlfODUV2+khcyR0LSCSfyCxQnaRPWc3SoSawCW1x4/5S38ya3GQCuX6RhdPX//M34Zzh3OsrJNHkcKx7hpgry3eo3C2X7zX5/ds/E0LefyzCYbGjX98fXw=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

That would be useful to a lot of people. I suggested that a while back
but have been fighting other fires.

PDB was a more complete and MUCH more brittle stub.

On 4/15/05, Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Dan, from a quick search it seems xen/ia64 doesn't have a GDB stub,
> is that right? (What exactly is pdb-stub about?)
> 
> Looking at arch/x86/cdb.c, it seems that most of this code could be made
> common, and each architecture would supply its own version of
> handle_register_read_command/handle_memory_read_command(). Would that be
> useful to you?
> 
> --
> Hollis Blanchard
> IBM Linux Technology Center
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.