Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/6] xen,xend,tools: NUMA support for Xen

[Ryan Harper <ryanh@xxxxxxxxxx>]

* Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> [2006-07-11 16:28]:
> > > What sort of box are these numbers taken from? If it's not a NUMA
> > > system then the slowdowns are rather poor. We're particularly
> > > interested in not slowing down non-NUMA and small-NUMA (e.g., AMD
> K8)
> > > x86 systems. They are what we really want to see measurements from.
> > 
> > The measurements are taken from a two-way Operton 248 (2.1Ghz) ,
> > small-NUMA.  I agree that there is significant overhead, however, we
> > aren't talking about fast path here; correct me if I'm wrong.   We
> > are only adding overhead to during domain startup.  The end result
> > being we pay for local memory allocation at creation time while
> > benefiting from local memory access for the lifetime of the domain.
> > 
> > I'm going to gather some oprofile data to see if I missed something
> > obvious, but in general I think that having local memory is of greater
> > benefit for the lifetime of a domain than the cost we incur during its
> > creation.
> 
> What do the numbers look like on a 1 node system?

For K8 small numa, I don't have a 1 node system available.

> 
> The shadow mode code potentially churns the page allocator a fair bit.
> It'll be disappointing if we have to add complexity of quicklists etc. 

Yeah, I forgot about shadow mode; good point.

> 
> It does kind of surprise me that the overhead is as high as you've
> measured. In the case where there's memory available in the favoured
> node I'd expect allocation performance to be very similar. 4 times
> slower and worsening for large allocations seems odd -- 0.3 microseconds
> a page is a bit more than I'd expect during back-to-back allocations.
> It's certainly worth trying to understand the overhead a bit more.

I agree.  I'm a little mystified by the overhead as well.  On the larger
system, ballooning up to 23G had something like 11% overhead, which was
more reasonable, though the domain creation tests showed more than 11%
on that system as well.  I'll get the oprofile data and take a look.

-- 
Ryan Harper
Software Engineer; Linux Technology Center
IBM Corp., Austin, Tx
(512) 838-9253   T/L: 678-9253
ryanh@xxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel