[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] Re: A proposal - binary
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 12:06:28PM -0700, David Lang wrote: > I understand this, but for example a UML 2.6.10 kernel will continue to run > unmodified on top of a 2.6.17 kernel, the ABI used is stable. however if > you have a 2.6.10 host with a 2.6.10 UML guest and want to run a 2.6.17 > guest you may (but not nessasarily must) have to upgrade the host to 2.6.17 > or later. Why might you have to do that? Jeff _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |