[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Xen-devel] Re: A wrong assert in get_ioreq()?
- To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- From: "Paul Samon" <paul.samon@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 19:12:32 +0800
- Delivery-date: Wed, 04 Jul 2007 04:10:22 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=mabxd/vLPKA3sUGomb5M5ClVv+k4zU+9hOf5Wpp50pHvPdry40F4YS1LKHjdLClIwNeHiejYW7lsn1D0FOLfBWOVkXXK1h4CziX+U2Uv+EaqRpgxF5CuR93tYTUsSXYaz+2gEpejNlKp4Nv3pZMbNhPXqfim/2uH+rOWDx0e1us=
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
Sorry, I meant the assert should "ASSERT(v == current)."
On 7/4/07, Paul Samon <paul.samon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I don't think it should be
ASSERT(v == current).
we don't get the lock first, and I think we needn't it.
Am I missing something?
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|