[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC V8 3/5] xen, libxc: Force-enable relevant MSR events
- To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>, Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Razvan Cojocaru <rcojocaru@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 11:26:37 +0300
- Cc: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx>, "stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx" <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, "tim@xxxxxxx" <tim@xxxxxxx>, Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@xxxxxxxxx>, "ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx" <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/
- Delivery-date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 08:26:24 +0000
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=bitdefender.com; b=VCNCNkob9d4uBe8mPtkDWyOGs2LK3bGeA29IzGD401B6MocugSX0xJrLZSleeEFuT5GY/98+PRnrKcpd4lG011QJfYN7un41G19DireY8XgH8kZlDBxEK6KRHSt9Q7z6mMXXYJOgqVz+/dxkgiMVbfBkiTdalHOpqZ2OK3RzseWGVcdslvY7rlFGqMAiE1xO9sqGQmgqSpparGVfv3mpo0L/9qz8aDwsb7VfpwMj1vQ/j1O4LeVpPAt4VE3zA49+bbosrFOa9zmxAz9zAAF/LBH0haisAYw9zD+lGFUCeQc49WNpHu8PbbflLYD5LIE23uj/gmSJt3OT/YztadqYSQ==; h=Received:Received:Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-BitDefender-Scanner:X-BitDefender-Spam:X-BitDefender-SpamStamp:X-BitDefender-CF-Stamp;
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
On 08/28/2014 11:25 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 28.08.14 at 09:40, <rcojocaru@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 08/27/2014 11:25 PM, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>>>> From: Razvan Cojocaru [mailto:rcojocaru@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>>>> +const u32 vmx_msrs_exit_array[] = {
>>>> + MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_EIP,
>>>> + MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_ESP,
>>>> + MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_CS,
>>>> + MSR_IA32_MC0_CTL,
>>>> + MSR_STAR,
>>>> + MSR_LSTAR
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +const unsigned int vmx_msrs_exit_array_size =
>>>> + ARRAY_SIZE(vmx_msrs_exit_array);
>>>> +
>>>
>>> prefer a name including 'force' purpose or at least have a comment
>>> to describe the intention, so its meaning is explained as early as possible.
>>
>> How would vmx_force_enabled_msrs_array (with a comment added) sound to
>> you and Jan?
>
> vmx_introspection_force_enabled_msrs[]?
No problem, I'll rename it to that.
Thanks,
Razvan Cojocaru
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
