Re: [Xen-devel] stable trees (was: [xen-4.2-testing test] 58584: regressions)

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 24.06.15 at 11:06, <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> After that baseline I ran a few tests of just the windows + qemuu stuff:
> http://xenbits.xen.org/people/ianc/tmp/adhoc/37619/ 
> 
> was allowing free reign on the machines and was mostly successful, apart
> from the windows-install failure on lake-frog. Looking at the test
> history this seems to have always been a problem on the old infra.
> *-frog are "AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6168" which is as close as the old
> infra has to the new colos merlot[01] which is "AMD Opteron(tm)
> Processor 6376".
> 
> With that in mind I reran with things limited to the two frog-* boxes
> and got http://xenbits.xen.org/people/ianc/tmp/adhoc/37624/.
> 
> The windows-install of winxpsp3 persisted but there was no migration
> failure elsewhere.
> 
> It's not a lot of data, but in comparison with the results in the colo:
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/history/test-amd64-amd64 
> -xl-qemuu-win7-amd64/xen-4.5-testing.html 
> it looks like it's the newer system which is exposing the issue.

Thanks for doing all of this! While not pointing towards a solution
on the side of the newer systems, it at least reassures us that we
didn't release regressing software with 4.5.1.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel