[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] REST MAINTAINERS feedback requested Was:Re: [PATCH v5 01/28] HYPERCALL_version_op. New hypercall mirroring XENVER_ but sane.
- To: George Dunlap <dunlapg@xxxxxxxxx>
- From: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 16:26:50 +0100
- Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>, StefanoStabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, mpohlack@xxxxxxxxx, Ross Lagerwall <ross.lagerwall@xxxxxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>, sasha.levin@xxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Daniel De Graaf <dgdegra@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, KeirFraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 16:47:55 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
George Dunlap writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] REST MAINTAINERS feedback requested
Was:Re: [PATCH v5 01/28] HYPERCALL_version_op. New hypercall mirroring XENVER_
but sane."):
> Well we know which option Andy prefers, but are there other options
> that Andy is not absolutely opposed to? And we don't know anything
> about which option Jan prefers at all, except that it's not #4.
Let me go a bit further than George.
It's clear that there are various options, most of which are
tolerable. Buit if I'm trying to help referee a disagreement between
Andrew and Jan I would prefer to be choosing between Andrew's
preferred answer and Jan's preferred answer.
Jan: AFAICT it's clear that you would still like the current patch
reverted. Can you please say what, if anything, you would like to
replace it with ?
Thanks,
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
