[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 1/3] x86/ioreq server(patch for 4.7): Rename p2m_mmio_write_dm to p2m_ioreq_server.
- To: "Paul Durrant" <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 04:02:58 -0600
- Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Tim \(Xen.org\)" <tim@xxxxxxx>, George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Zhang Yu <yu.c.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Zhiyuan Lv <zhiyuan.lv@xxxxxxxxx>, JunNakajima <jun.nakajima@xxxxxxxxx>, "Keir \(Xen.org\)" <keir@xxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 10:03:11 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
>>> On 28.04.16 at 09:14, <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> From: Yu, Zhang [mailto:yu.c.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> Sent: 28 April 2016 03:47
>> Besides, do you think it acceptable we just replace p2m_mmio_write_dm
>> with p2m_ioreq_server in next version, or should we remove this p2m
>> type and define p2m_ioreq_server with a different value? :)
>>
>
> p2m_ioreq_server becomes defunct after the aforementioned patch. With that
> patch applied there will be no way to set that type on a p2m entry so it
> should be ok to re-use the type.
s/p2m_ioreq_server/p2m_mmio_write_dm/ ?
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
