[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 09/11] IOMMU: propagate IOMMU Device-TLB flush error up to IOMMU suspending
>>> On 28.04.16 at 17:03, <quan.xu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On April 28, 2016 10:36 PM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> On 28.04.16 at 16:14, <quan.xu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On April 25, 2016 7:53 PM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >>> On 18.04.16 at 16:00, <quan.xu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> > --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c >> >> > +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c >> > >> > >> >> > -static void iommu_flush_all(void) >> >> > +static int iommu_flush_all(void) >> >> >> >> __must_check >> >> >> > >> > The iommu_flush_all() is also called in intel_iommu_hwdom_init() and >> > vtd_crash_shutdown(). >> > As we were on the same page, we can ignore the error code propagation >> > for these two call trees. >> >> I don't know what you're referring to here with "we were on the same page". > I >> don't think I've ever agreed (in the context of this series) to ignore any > error >> returns. >> > > > Look at the below link. > http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-02/msg03234.html Which still talks about (conditionally) logging messages, not ignoring of errors. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |