[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 09/11] IOMMU: propagate IOMMU Device-TLB flush error up to IOMMU suspending
On April 28, 2016 11:12 PM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> On 28.04.16 at 17:03, <quan.xu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On April 28, 2016 10:36 PM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >>> On 28.04.16 at 16:14, <quan.xu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > On April 25, 2016 7:53 PM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >> >>> On 18.04.16 at 16:00, <quan.xu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >> > --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c > >> >> > +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c > >> > > >> > > >> >> > -static void iommu_flush_all(void) > >> >> > +static int iommu_flush_all(void) > >> >> > >> >> __must_check > >> >> > >> > > >> > The iommu_flush_all() is also called in intel_iommu_hwdom_init() > >> > and vtd_crash_shutdown(). > >> > As we were on the same page, we can ignore the error code > >> > propagation for these two call trees. > >> > >> I don't know what you're referring to here with "we were on the same > page". > > I > >> don't think I've ever agreed (in the context of this series) to > >> ignore any > > error > >> returns. > >> > > > > > > Look at the below link. > > http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-02/msg03234.h > > tml > > Which still talks about (conditionally) logging messages, not ignoring of > errors. > Sorry, check it again. in intel_iommu_hwdom_init() and vtd_crash_shutdown(), I still need to log messages as: if ( iommu_flush_all() ) printk() ? Thanks for your patience. Quan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |