[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3] Livepatch for ARM 64 and 32.
On 16/09/2016 16:35, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 03:45:12PM +0200, Julien Grall wrote:On 16/09/2016 15:41, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 03:35:21PM +0200, Julien Grall wrote:Hi Konrad, On 11/09/2016 22:35, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:v2: [http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/xen/devel/444461?page=last] - Addressed the two outstanding concerns: CPU bit feature to test alternative test-case, and errata #843419 on some Cortex-A53I am a bit confused. I haven't spotted any specific code for this. How did you handle it?livepatch: x86, ARM, alternative: Expose FEATURE_LIVEPATCHAFAICT, this only handles this first part (CPU bit feature) not the errata #843419. Did I miss anything?My recollection is (from Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 15:49:55 +0100 From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx> To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, konrad@xxxxxxxxxx, ross.lagerwall@xxxxxxxxxx, sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Livepatch for ARM 64 and 32. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 " "> - #13 "livepatch: Initial ARM64 support."Need to look in erratum #843419 on some Cortex-A53 and figuring out how to avoid payloads having R_AARCH64_ADR_PREL_PG_HI21 relocations.I will not considered this has a blocker for this series. Having livepatching on all the other boards for Xen 4.8 would still be awesome :). " So I moved it off to 4.9 list. Oh, I understood "Addressed the two outstanding concerns" as "It was fixed in the code". Maybe I was expecting too much to shrink down my todo list ^^. -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |