Re: [Xen-devel] Duplicated memory node in the Device-Tree (WAS [XEN] Re: Duplicated memory nodes cause the BUG())

[Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>]

On 26/07/17 10:08, Andrii Anisov wrote:
> Hello,
Hi Andrii,

> On 25.07.17 21:11, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Jul 2017, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > Furthermore, if you look at the wikipage for Renesas R-Car on Xen
> > > (see [1]), a
> > > specific DT for Xen is provided.
> Well, we introduced a specific DT as a faster way to get the system up
> and running. But the target is to get rid of it.
> Except that nasty issue with memory banks, there is another one: how to
> handle reserved memory regions needed for some IP's functionality (e.g.
> ADSP).
> As I already said I do cleanup remaining nits one by one.
>
> > That's true. It does not make sense to do this until we get rid of the
> > Xen specific R-Car device tree on the wiki.
> IMO, we it should appear correspondent functionality in XEN first, and
> latter get rid of specific device tree on the wiki. So that we will have
> the wiki steps adequate to the current master.
It sounds like to me that a non-modified DT for Xen on R-Car is not for 
tomorrow...
So here, the first and only sensible option is to work with the vendor 
to modify the device-tree.
If the vendor is not willing to do it, then we can discuss about 
implementing a fix in Xen.
Cheers,

--
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel