Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tools/xenstore: Do not abort xenstore-ls if a node disappears while iterating

[Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 04:59:42PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-03-04 at 15:46 +0000, Wei Liu wrote:
[...]
> > Also you mentioned "a node disappears", I thought that was the case you
> > cared about, hence my suggestion.
> 
> That's my primary use case, yes. Obviously we should make it do the
> right thing in the general case while we're thinking about it. I'm
> inclined to go with Juergen's suggestion of ignoring ENOENT and EACCES
> (or should that have been EPERM?), yet still aborting for everything
> else.
> 

I can't seem to find EACCESS in xenstored code, but I do find EPERM.
Adding EPERM would be fine by me.

Wei.

> 



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel