[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] GPLPV network performance


  • To: James Harper <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Grant McWilliams <grantmasterflash@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 20:50:18 -0800
  • Cc: "Fajar A. Nugraha" <fajar@xxxxxxxxx>, xen-users <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Robert Dunkley <Robert@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 20:51:38 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=fL1Ac778p0iAFm0ygxhypwGv7v+//VcEuUso4b1hl4iOakfKaBMEaQnsyFUxkFGJrM DJTBtTd2vXNeU5FPagtLwNNDYZH3R3sosu5uRjLRgLNVJa17kE67yOSTQcAKDkZDERIi iq2pYvNDMPknaDdsNh5GAfEqlJOgOTzkwxEuo=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 3:50 PM, James Harper <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Those DomU->DomU figures (mine and yours) are obviously less than
desirable though, given the DomU->Dom0 performance... I'll see what I
can do.

James


I hope I'm wrong but I'm not sure there's much to do. I was curious about the numbers people were getting with Windows PV drivers. These match DomU to DomU in Linux PV. Transferring data to a DomU seems to be horribly inefficient and I'm not sure you'll be able to do anything about it. Seems like it's a Xen architecture thing. Like I said, I hope I'm wrong.

Grant
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.