Re: [Xen-users] redhat native vs. redhat on XCP

[Boris Quiroz <bquiroz.work@xxxxxxxxx>]

2011/1/12 Digimer <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On 01/12/2011 03:17 PM, Henrik Andersson wrote:
>> What makes you think that adding a virtualization layer to the picture
>> would increase the performance? Would be bit odd to have same operating
>> system perform better when it is run on a virtual machine.
>>
>> -Henrik Andersson
>
> I would suspect that OP is trying to asses whether the performance hit
> would be significant enough to outweigh the benefits of virtualization.
>
> --
> Digimer
> E-Mail: digimer@xxxxxxxxxxx
> AN!Whitepapers: http://alteeve.com
> Node Assassin:  http://nodeassassin.org
>

Answering Henrik's question: We just want to see the results. If RHEL
native process, for example, 5000 TPS and RHEL+XCP process 4900, we
obviously will continue with a virtualized environment because the
difference is not significant to us.

Literature says that performance for guest is near-native, and that's
what I wanna test. And if somebody has already done this kind of test,
I could know what to expect.

Thanks.


-- 
@cereal_bars

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users