[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] redhat native vs. redhat on XCP
2011/1/12 Digimer <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > On 01/12/2011 03:17 PM, Henrik Andersson wrote: >> What makes you think that adding a virtualization layer to the picture >> would increase the performance? Would be bit odd to have same operating >> system perform better when it is run on a virtual machine. >> >> -Henrik Andersson > > I would suspect that OP is trying to asses whether the performance hit > would be significant enough to outweigh the benefits of virtualization. > > -- > Digimer > E-Mail: digimer@xxxxxxxxxxx > AN!Whitepapers: http://alteeve.com > Node Assassin: http://nodeassassin.org > Answering Henrik's question: We just want to see the results. If RHEL native process, for example, 5000 TPS and RHEL+XCP process 4900, we obviously will continue with a virtualized environment because the difference is not significant to us. Literature says that performance for guest is near-native, and that's what I wanna test. And if somebody has already done this kind of test, I could know what to expect. Thanks. -- @cereal_bars _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |