Re: [MirageOS-devel] Lifecycle

[Nik Sultana <ns441@xxxxxxxxx>]

I think if we're asking to restart a service, then it might be expedient 
to avoid certain cleanups or deallocation at the stopping phase, since 
the same allocations or state will (optimistically speaking) be 
recreated soon at the starting phase. This could save wasted effort 
saved at the stopping phase. Presumably there would need some kind of 
timer to ensure that the full cleanup and deallocation does take place 
eventually, if the start fails. Cold vs warm vs tepid restart?
On 2016-07-19 20:01, Richard Mortier wrote:
> On 14 July 2016 at 18:16, Daniel Bünzli <daniel.buenzli@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 
> wrote:
> > Le jeudi, 14 juillet 2016 à 18:10, Daniel Bünzli a écrit :
> > > Since you have to deal with that idea anyway I'd say it's better not 
> > > to support a restart event.
> > It could however be added as a *hint* to the stop event payload.
> Concretely, what would be done with that hint though?
_______________________________________________
MirageOS-devel mailing list
MirageOS-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mirageos-devel