Re: [MirageOS-devel] Lifecycle

[Mindy <mindy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 07/19/2016 08:09 PM, Nik Sultana wrote:
> I think if we're asking to restart a service, then it might be 
> expedient to avoid certain cleanups or deallocation at the stopping 
> phase, since the same allocations or state will (optimistically 
> speaking) be recreated soon at the starting phase. This could save 
> wasted effort saved at the stopping phase. Presumably there would need 
> some kind of timer to ensure that the full cleanup and deallocation 
> does take place eventually, if the start fails. Cold vs warm vs tepid 
> restart?
Generally when I'm asking to restart a service, I'm doing it because I 
want it to drop all of its state.  Frequently, I want it to come back 
up, cleanly, as quickly as it can.
-Mindy

_______________________________________________
MirageOS-devel mailing list
MirageOS-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mirageos-devel