Xen project Mailing List

On 11 Aug 2015, at 02:53, Sarah Conway <sconway@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Yes, that would be great. Once it goes live, I'll push it on social.

Thanks,

On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
I guess the Docker piece should be published sometime tomorrow
(Tuesday)?

On Thu, 6 Aug 2015, Lars Kurth wrote:
> We should run the Rumpkernel piece first. Maybe tomorrow? I need someone
> else to pull the trigger, after Antti is done with his piece and happy
> That would buy Sarah some time
> Lars
>
> On 06/08/2015 14:12, "Stefano Stabellini"
> <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >Hi Sarah,
> >
> >that makes sense to me. I think it is mostly ready and shouldn't change
> >much in next couple of days. Certainly it will be publishable on Monday
> >next week.
> >
> >Cheers,
> >
> >Stefano
> >
> >On Thu, 6 Aug 2015, Sarah Conway wrote:
> >> Question, when will this run? I'd like to send it to a few reporters in
> >>advance. Maybe tee it up for Monday or
> >> Tuesday so I can pitch reporters tomorrow and Monday? I would like to
> >>add some promos to the end re: relevant
> >> talks at XenDevSummit and CloudOpen too.
> >> Sarah
> >>
> >> On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>wrote:
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: publicity-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:publicity-
> >> > bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Anil Madhavapeddy
> >> > Sent: 06 August 2015 12:13
> >> > To: Stefano Stabellini
> >> > Cc: Lars Kurth; publicity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > Subject: Re: [Publicity] Docker versus Virtual Machines
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > > On 6 Aug 2015, at 10:15, Stefano Stabellini
> >> > <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > On Wed, 5 Aug 2015, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
> >> > >> On 5 Aug 2015, at 17:27, Stefano Stabellini
> >> > <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> On Wed, 5 Aug 2015, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
> >> > >>>> On 5 Aug 2015, at 12:27, Stefano Stabellini
> >> > <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>> Hi all,
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>> I wrote a "Docker versus Virtual Machines" article for
> >>the Xen Project
> >> > >>>>> blog, let me know what you think!
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>> https://blog.xenproject.org/?p=10910&preview=true
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> I like it all except for the title, which bears no
> >>resemblance to the
> >> > >>>> contents of the post (which is about how VMs are
> >>complementary to
> >> > >>>> Docker's future). How about "Docker: meet virtual
> >>machines", or
> >> > something
> >> > >>>> similar?
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> Yes, I think you are right.
> >> > >>> What about "Docker and the future of Virtual Machines"?
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Something a little more specific? "Using Docker as a Virtual
> >>Machine
> >> > manager" or something (not quite right).
> >> > >
> >> > > What about starting with the simple question that is phrased
> >>at the
> >> > > beginning of the article:
> >> > >
> >> > > "Will Docker replace Virtual Machines?"
> >> >
> >> > Excellent! That sounds good to me.
> >> >
> >> > One epic hack that is a non-native container is Joyent's
> >>Linux-ABI-in-Illumos,
> >> > which uses runs Docker Linux containers natively in Illumos:
> >> > https://www.joyent.com/blog/2014-in-review-docker-rising
> >> >
> >> > It's possible to do, appears to be used in production, but is
> >>clearly very
> >> > complex. Unsure how to phrase that in a blog post :-)
> >> >
> >>
> >> The concept was around while I was still at Sun ~10 years ago. Google
> >>'linux branded zone solaris'. And
> >> what was shipped was actually the second iteration of the idea (the
> >>first one being very hacky).
>
>

--
Sarah Conway
PR Manager
The Linux Foundation
sconway@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(978) 578-5300 Cell
Skype: sarah.k.conway
_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity