Re: [Publicity] Docker versus Virtual Machines

[Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Sure

On Tue, 11 Aug 2015, Lars Kurth wrote:
> Let's say at 15:00 UK time today?Lars
>
>       On 11 Aug 2015, at 02:53, Sarah Conway <sconway@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
> wrote:
>
> Yes, that would be great. Once it goes live, I'll push it on social.
> Thanks,
>
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Stefano
> StabelliniÂ<stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>       I guess the Docker piece should be published sometime tomorrow
>       (Tuesday)?
>
>       On Thu, 6 Aug 2015, Lars Kurth wrote:
>       > We should run the Rumpkernel piece first. Maybe tomorrow? I need
>       someone
>       > else to pull the trigger, after Antti is done with his piece and
>       happy
>       > That would buy Sarah some time
>       > Lars
>       >
>       > On 06/08/2015 14:12, "Stefano Stabellini"
>       > <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>       >
>       > >Hi Sarah,
>       > >
>       > >that makes sense to me. I think it is mostly ready and shouldn't
>       change
>       > >much in next couple of days. Certainly it will be publishable on
>       Monday
>       > >next week.
>       > >
>       > >Cheers,
>       > >
>       > >Stefano
>       > >
>       > >On Thu, 6 Aug 2015, Sarah Conway wrote:
>       > >> Question, when will this run? I'd like to send it to a few
>       reporters in
>       > >>advance. Maybe tee it up for Monday or
>       > >> Tuesday so I can pitch reporters tomorrow and Monday? I would
>       like to
>       > >>add some promos to the end re: relevant
>       > >> talks at XenDevSummit and CloudOpen too.
>       > >> Sarah
>       > >>
>       > >> On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Paul Durrant
>       <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>
>       > >>wrote:
>       > >>Â Â Â Â> -----Original Message-----
>       > >>Â Â Â Â>
>       From:Âpublicity-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxÂ[mailto:publicity-
>       > >>Â Â Â Â>Âbounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Anil
>       Madhavapeddy
>       > >>Â Â Â Â> Sent: 06 August 2015 12:13
>       > >>Â Â Â Â> To: Stefano Stabellini
>       > >>Â Â Â Â> Cc: Lars Kurth;Âpublicity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>       > >>Â Â Â Â> Subject: Re: [Publicity] Docker versus Virtual Machines
>       > >>Â Â Â Â>
>       > >>Â Â Â Â>
>       > >>Â Â Â Â> > On 6 Aug 2015, at 10:15, Stefano Stabellini
>       > >>Â Â Â Â> <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>       > >>Â Â Â Â> >
>       > >>Â Â Â Â> > On Wed, 5 Aug 2015, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
>       > >>Â Â Â Â> >> On 5 Aug 2015, at 17:27, Stefano Stabellini
>       > >>Â Â Â Â> <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>       > >>Â Â Â Â> >>>
>       > >>Â Â Â Â> >>> On Wed, 5 Aug 2015, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
>       > >>Â Â Â Â> >>>> On 5 Aug 2015, at 12:27, Stefano Stabellini
>       > >>Â Â Â Â> <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>       > >>Â Â Â Â> >>>>>
>       > >>Â Â Â Â> >>>>> Hi all,
>       > >>Â Â Â Â> >>>>>
>       > >>Â Â Â Â> >>>>> I wrote a "Docker versus Virtual Machines" article
>       for
>       > >>the Xen Project
>       > >>Â Â Â Â> >>>>> blog, let me know what you think!
>       > >>Â Â Â Â> >>>>>
>       > >>Â Â Â Â> >>>>>Âhttps://blog.xenproject.org/?p=10910&preview=true
>       > >>Â Â Â Â> >>>>
>       > >>Â Â Â Â> >>>> I like it all except for the title, which bears no
>       > >>resemblance to the
>       > >>Â Â Â Â> >>>> contents of the post (which is about how VMs are
>       > >>complementary to
>       > >>   Â> >>>> Docker's future). How about "Docker: meet virtual
>       > >>machines", or
>       > >>Â Â Â Â> something
>       > >>Â Â Â Â> >>>> similar?
>       > >>Â Â Â Â> >>>
>       > >>Â Â Â Â> >>> Yes, I think you are right.
>       > >>Â Â Â Â> >>> What about "Docker and the future of Virtual
>       Machines"?
>       > >>Â Â Â Â> >>
>       > >>Â Â Â Â> >> Something a little more specific? "Using Docker as a
>       Virtual
>       > >>Machine
>       > >>Â Â Â Â> manager" or something (not quite right).
>       > >>Â Â Â Â> >
>       > >>Â Â Â Â> > What about starting with the simple question that is
>       phrased
>       > >>at the
>       > >>Â Â Â Â> > beginning of the article:
>       > >>Â Â Â Â> >
>       > >>Â Â Â Â> > "Will Docker replace Virtual Machines?"
>       > >>Â Â Â Â>
>       > >>Â Â Â Â> Excellent! That sounds good to me.
>       > >>Â Â Â Â>
>       > >>Â Â Â Â> One epic hack that is a non-native container is Joyent's
>       > >>Linux-ABI-in-Illumos,
>       > >>Â Â Â Â> which uses runs Docker Linux containers natively in
>       Illumos:
>       > >>Â Â Â Â>Âhttps://www.joyent.com/blog/2014-in-review-docker-rising
>       > >>Â Â Â Â>
>       > >>Â Â Â Â> It's possible to do, appears to be used in production,
>       but is
>       > >>clearly very
>       > >>   Â> complex. Unsure how to phrase that in a blog post :-)
>       > >>Â Â Â Â>
>       > >>
>       > >> The concept was around while I was still at Sun ~10 years ago.
>       Google
>       > >>'linux branded zone solaris'. And
>       > >> what was shipped was actually the second iteration of the idea
>       (the
>       > >>first one being very hacky).
>       >
>       >
>
>
>
>
> --Â
> Sarah Conway
> PR Manager
> The Linux Foundation
> sconway@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> (978) 578-5300 ÂCell
> Skype: Âsarah.k.conway
> _______________________________________________
> Publicity mailing list
> Publicity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity
>
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity