[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Xen Platform QoS design discussion
>>> "Xu, Dongxiao" <dongxiao.xu@xxxxxxxxx> 05/29/14 2:46 AM >>> >I think Jan's opinion here is similar to what I proposed in the beginning of >this thread. >The only difference is that, Jan prefers to get the CQM data per-socket and >per-domain >with data copying, while I proposed to get the CQM data per-domain for all >sockets >that can reduce the amount of hypercalls. I don't think I ever voiced any preference between these two. All I said it depends on prevalent usage models, and to date I don't think I've seen a proper analysis of what the main usage model would be - it all seems guesswork and/or taking random examples. What I did say I'd prefer is to have all this done outside the hypervisor, with the hypervisor just providing fundamental infrastructure (MSR accesses). Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |