[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [edk2] OVMF broken under Xen (in PCI initialisation)
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 05:39:40AM +0000, Ni, Ruiyu wrote: > > > Regards, > Ray > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Gary Lin [mailto:glin@xxxxxxxx] > >Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2016 12:29 PM > >To: Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu.ni@xxxxxxxxx> > >Cc: edk2-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxx; Xen Devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >Subject: Re: [edk2] OVMF broken under Xen (in PCI initialisation) > > > >On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 09:40:42AM +0000, Ni, Ruiyu wrote: > >> Gary, > >> I can reproduce the issue and have debugged to get the reason. > >> In MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciBusDxe/PciEnumeratorSupport.c: > >> PciEnumeratorLight() calls PciRootBridgeIo->Configuration() > >> while the Configuration returns EFI_UNSUPPORTED resulting > >> the PciBus driver exits earlier. > >> You could try to manually set MinBus to 0 and MaxBus to 0xFF. > >> > >Do you mean to set MinBus and MaxBus in PciGetBusRange() ? > >Should I also keep the EFI_UNSUPPORTED code in Configuration() ? > Keep returning EFI_UNSUPPORTED in Configuration() and set > MinBus/MaxBus in PciGetBusRange(). > > > > >> The second change you need to make is in PciIo.c: > >> Change GetMmioAddressTranslationOffset() to return 0 instead > >> of -1 when error occurs > >> > > > >Should I also remove "ASSERT (FALSE);" ? > > > ASSERT() won't be hit. > It didn't work (see my attached patch) :( BTW, if Configuration() already returns EFI_UNSUPPORTED, then there is no way to invoke PciGetBusRange(). Besides, MaxBus was never used in PciEnumeratorLight(), so it's meaningless to assign any value to it. Cheers, Gary Lin > > > >Cheers, > > > >Gary Lin > > > >> With the above 2 changes, can you check whether the system can > >> boot? > >> > >> If it can boot, then we need to think about what the proper fix is. > >> For OVMF above Xen, the PCI resources are assigned by Xen other than > >> PciBus driver. So PciRootBridgeIo->Configuration() doesn't know > >> the resource assignment information. > >> With old PciHostBridge driver, the Configuration() returns BUS resource > >> descriptor with MinBus = MaxBus = 0 (default value), so that the PciBus > >> driver can detect all devices in BUS 0, but I guess devices in BUS 1+ > >> cannot > >> be detected. > >> > >> Does Xen pass the resource assignment information through some memory > >> blob to firmware? If yes, we could think about let PciHostBridgeLib pass > >> that > >> information to PciHostBridge driver. If no, we also could let > >> PciHostBridgeLib > >> collect the information (IO/MEM/BUS resource assignment) and pass that > >> to PciHostBridgeDxe driver. > >> > >> And we need to have a way to tell PciHostBridgeDxe the resource information > >> passed from PciHostBridgeLib is available resource to assign, or already > >> allocated. > >> Maybe just depends on the PcdPciBusDisableEnumeration. still thinking. > >> > >> > >> Regards, > >> Ray > >> > >> >-----Original Message----- > >> >From: Gary Lin [mailto:glin@xxxxxxxx] > >> >Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 4:40 PM > >> >To: Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu.ni@xxxxxxxxx> > >> >Cc: edk2-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxx; Xen Devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> >Subject: Re: [edk2] OVMF broken under Xen (in PCI initialisation) > >> > > >> >On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 08:19:49AM +0000, Ni, Ruiyu wrote: > >> >> Gary, > >> >> Maybe the system boots to Shell well but the video isn't initialized > >> >> properly. > >> >> Can you build the firmware using "-D DEBUG_ON_SERIAL_PORT" switch and > >> >> give me the boot log? > >> >> > >> >Hi Ray, > >> > > >> >I already did and it's how I make the firmware spit the log :-( > >> > > >> >Thanks, > >> > > >> >Gary Lin > >> > > >> >> Regards, > >> >> Ray > >> >> > >> >> From: Gary Lin [mailto:glin@xxxxxxxx] > >> >> Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 3:35 PM > >> >> To: Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu.ni@xxxxxxxxx> > >> >> Cc: Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>; > >> >> edk2-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxx; Xen Devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> >> Subject: Re: [edk2] OVMF broken under Xen (in PCI initialisation) > >> >> > >> >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 06:43:56AM +0000, Ni, Ruiyu wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > Regards, > >> >> > Ray > >> >> > > >> >> > >-----Original Message----- > >> >> > >From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf > >> >> > >Of Anthony PERARD > >> >> > >Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 10:48 PM > >> >> > >To: edk2-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:edk2-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> >> > >Cc: Xen Devel > >> >> > ><xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > >> >> > >Subject: [edk2] OVMF broken under Xen (in PCI initialisation) > >> >> > > > >> >> > >Hi, > >> >> > > > >> >> > >Following the switch to MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciHostBridgeDxe, the > >> >> > >pci root > >> >> > >bridge does not finish to initialize and breaks under Xen. > >> >> > > > >> >> > >There are several issue probably due to the use of > >> >> > >PcdPciDisableBusEnumeration=TRUE. > >> >> > > > >> >> > >First one: > >> >> > >ASSERT MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciRootBridgeIo.c(99): > >> >> > >Bridge->Mem.Limit < > >> >0x0000000100000000ULL > >> >> > > > >> >> > >This patch would fix the first assert: > >> >> > >diff --git a/OvmfPkg/PlatformPei/Xen.c b/OvmfPkg/PlatformPei/Xen.c > >> >> > >index 7fa9019..15ec7a7 100644 > >> >> > >--- a/OvmfPkg/PlatformPei/Xen.c > >> >> > >+++ b/OvmfPkg/PlatformPei/Xen.c > >> >> > >@@ -227,5 +227,11 @@ InitializeXen ( > >> >> > > > >> >> > > PcdSetBool (PcdPciDisableBusEnumeration, TRUE); > >> >> > > > >> >> > >+ // Values from hvmloader > >> >> > >+#define PCI_MEM_END 0xFC000000 > >> >> > >+#define HVM_BELOW_4G_MMIO_START 0xF0000000 > >> >> > >+ PcdSet64 (PcdPciMmio32Base, HVM_BELOW_4G_MMIO_START); > >> >> > >+ PcdSet64 (PcdPciMmio32Size, PCI_MEM_END - > >> >> > >HVM_BELOW_4G_MMIO_START); > >> >> > >+ > >> >> > > return EFI_SUCCESS; > >> >> > > } > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > >But that not enough, next assert is: > >> >> > >ASSERT MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciBusDxe/PciDeviceSupport.c(807): > >> >> > >RootBridge != ((void *) 0) > >> >> > > > >> >> > >I have worked around this one with the following patch. That would > >> >> > >correspond to how the former implementation in OvmfPkg was > >> >> > >initializing the > >> >> > >struct. Maybe a better way would be to fill ResAllocated under Xen, > >> >> > >somehow. Under Xen, the ResAllocNode status is not allocated, so no > >> >> > >Descriptor are created. > >> >> > > > >> >> > >diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciRootBridgeIo.c > >> >> > >b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciRootBridgeIo.c > >> >> > >index cda9b49..eda92b6 100644 > >> >> > >--- a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciRootBridgeIo.c > >> >> > >+++ b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciRootBridgeIo.c > >> >> > >@@ -1509,15 +1509,13 @@ RootBridgeIoConfiguration ( > >> >> > > > >> >> > > ResAllocNode = &RootBridge->ResAllocNode[Index]; > >> >> > > > >> >> > >- if (ResAllocNode->Status != ResAllocated) { > >> >> > >- continue; > >> >> > >- } > >> >> > >- > >> >> > > Descriptor->Desc = ACPI_ADDRESS_SPACE_DESCRIPTOR; > >> >> > > Descriptor->Len = sizeof (EFI_ACPI_ADDRESS_SPACE_DESCRIPTOR) - > >> >> > > 3; > >> >> > >+ if (ResAllocNode->Status != ResAllocated) { > >> >> > > Descriptor->AddrRangeMin = ResAllocNode->Base; > >> >> > > Descriptor->AddrRangeMax = ResAllocNode->Base + > >> >> > > ResAllocNode->Length - 1; > >> >> > > Descriptor->AddrLen = ResAllocNode->Length; > >> >> > >+ } > >> >> > > switch (ResAllocNode->Type) { > >> >> > > > >> >> > I think a more proper fix is to return EFI_UNSUPPORTED without > >> >> > returning any > >> >> > descriptors when the PcdPciDisableBusEnumeration is TRUE. > >> >> > Per UEFI Spec, EFI_UNSUPPORTED means "The current configuration of > >> >> > this PCI > >> >> > root bridge could not be retrieved." It's true when the PCD is true. > >> >> > > >> >> > > > >> >> > >That leads to one last assert: > >> >> > >> QemuVideo: Cirrus 5446 detected > >> >> > >> InstallProtocolInterface: 09576E91-6D3F-11D2-8E39-00A0C969723B > >> >> > >> 7B9EF598 > >> >> > >> Adding Mode 0 as Cirrus Internal Mode 0: 640x480, 32-bit, 60 Hz > >> >> > >> Adding Mode 1 as Cirrus Internal Mode 1: 800x600, 32-bit, 60 Hz > >> >> > >> Adding Mode 2 as Cirrus Internal Mode 2: 1024x768, 24-bit, 60 Hz > >> >> > >> PixelBlueGreenRedReserved8BitPerColor > >> >> > >> ASSERT > >> >> > >> /local/home/sheep/work/ovmf/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciBusDxe/PciIo.c(1789): > >> >> > >> ((BOOLEAN)(0==1)) > >> >> > >For this one, I've workaround by reverting patch 7b0a1ea > >> >> > >(MdeModuelPkg/PciBus: Return AddrTranslationOffset in > >> >> > >GetBarAttributes). > >> >> > >That issue was introduce while still using the USE_OLD_PCI_HOST. > >> >> > > > >> >> > >Any idee or pointer on how to fix those issues ? > >> >> > > >> >> > When the PciRootBridgeIo.Configuration() returns EFI_UNSUPPORTED, > >> >> > this assertion > >> >> > can be fixed as well. Correct? > >> >> > >> >> I tried to make RootBridgeIoConfiguration() return EFI_UNSUPPORTED > >> >> (see the attachment), and those asserts were gone. However, the system > >> >> stuck somewhere after loading shell.efi. Here are the messages from the > >> >> debug log: > >> >> > >> >> BdsLibConnectAll > >> >> Select Item: 0xE > >> >> Memory Previous Current Next > >> >> Type Pages Pages Pages > >> >> ====== ======== ======== ======== > >> >> 0A 00000004 00000001 00000004 > >> >> 09 00000008 00000011 00000015 > >> >> 00 00000004 00000001 00000004 > >> >> 06 00000024 00000057 0000006C > >> >> 05 00000030 00000063 0000007B > >> >> 03 00000180 0000048D 000005B0 > >> >> 04 00000F00 00000B65 00000F00 > >> >> Booting EFI Internal Shell > >> >> InstallProtocolInterface: 5B1B31A1-9562-11D2-8E3F-00A0C969723B 3EA580C0 > >> >> Loading driver at 0x0003E03F000 EntryPoint=0x0003E03F240 Shell.efi > >> >> InstallProtocolInterface: BC62157E-3E33-4FEC-9920-2D3B36D750DF 3EA58B98 > >> >> InstallProtocolInterface: 387477C2-69C7-11D2-8E39-00A0C969723B 3EA54320 > >> >> InstallProtocolInterface: 752F3136-4E16-4FDC-A22A-E5F46812F4CA 3EA53CD8 > >> >> InstallProtocolInterface: 6302D008-7F9B-4F30-87AC-60C9FEF5DA4E 3E16B580 > >> >> > >> >> I couldn't find out where it stuck unless there is a way to attach gdb > >> >> to Xen HVM for source level debugging :-( > >> >> > >> >> Thanks, > >> >> > >> >> Gary Lin > >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> edk2-devel mailing list > >> >> edk2-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxx > >> >> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel > >> >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> edk2-devel mailing list > >> edk2-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxx > >> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel > >> > _______________________________________________ > edk2-devel mailing list > edk2-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel > Attachment:
ovmf-hack-1.patch _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |