[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] arm/libxl: Emulated PCI device tree node in libxl [and 1 more messages]
- To: Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>, Ian Jackson <iwj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Bertrand Marquis <Bertrand.Marquis@xxxxxxx>
- From: Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 10:01:47 +0100
- Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Rahul Singh <rahul.singh@xxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>, Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>, Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Volodymyr Babchuk <Volodymyr_Babchuk@xxxxxxxx>, Andre Przywara <Andre.Przywara@xxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 09:01:56 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
Hi Michal,
On 15/10/2021 08:41, Michal Orzel wrote:
Do you agree on the following approach:
1. Modify argument of libxl__arch_domain_init_hw_description to
libxl_domain_config (patch 1)
2. Modify argument of libxl__prepare_dtb to libxl_domain_config (patch 2)
3. Remove arch_arm.vpci completely and in libxl__prepare_dtb add a check (patch
3):
if (d_config->num_pcidevs)
FDT( make_vpci_node(gc, fdt, ainfo, dom) );
+ make_vpci_node implementation
Does it sound ok for you?
This sounds ok to me.
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall
|
