Re: [Publicity] Blog post: OSSTest Standalone Mode Step by Step

[Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 03:41:47PM +0100, Lars Kurth wrote:
> On 26/09/2013 15:37, George Dunlap wrote:
> >But we should probably at least mention it, and how osstest
> >relates to it.  How about something like this:
> >
> >"Some readers may recall the recent announcement of open-sourcing
> >XenRT, and wondering about the relationship between osstest and
> >XenRT.  Long-term, we expect that XenRT will mature as an open
> >development project and eventually displace osstest.  But that is
> >not likely to happen for another six months to a year.  Developing
> >osstest has benefits for the current development, and we hope that
> >getting people involved in writing test cases for osstest will be
> >of service in helping people write test cases for XenRT when it
> >becomes available.  So we have decided to continue to develop
> >osstest until XenRT is ready to replace it."
> I think that works. Link to 
> http://blog.xen.org/index.php/2013/09/04/evolving-the-xen-project-test-infrastructure/
> - this does actually say that there could be a case for both
> 

This is now done.

> Lars

_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity