[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] xen compilation is giving errors
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Tapas Mishra <mightydreams@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha <list@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Tapas Mishra <mightydreams@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >>>> - Processor type and features -> High Memory Support -> 64GB >>> Yes selected this >>>> - Processor type and features -> Paravirtualized guest support -> "Xen >>>> guest support" >>> No I did not get this option (I have no clue why) >> >> Did you download the correct kernel source? From JF's git tree, either >> xen/stable-2.6.32.x or xen/next-2.6.32? > Yes I did > git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git > linux-2.6-xen > cd linux-2.6-xen > git pull > git reset –hard > git checkout -b xen/stable origin/xen/stable > git pull > >> Did paravirtualized guest support option show up? > Yes > --- Paravirtualized guest support > [*] VMI Guest support (DEPRECATED) > [*] KVM paravirtualized clock > [*] KVM Guest support > [ ] Lguest guest support > -*- Enable paravirtualization code > [*] Paravirtualization layer for spinlocks Two things come to mind. One, you might be using a different branch than me. origin/xen/stable-2.6.32.x should contain newer code than origin/xen/stable (see http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git;a=heads for complete branch list). I haven't tested xen/stable, so I don't know what condition it currently is. Second, you might not select High Memory Support -> 64GB yet. By default, 4GB is selected instead of 64GB, in which case Xen options will be hidden (just like what you pasted). Other than those two, I don't know what else can cause the difference. -- Fajar _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |