[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] arm/libxl: Emulated PCI device tree node in libxl [and 1 more messages]
- To: Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>
- From: Ian Jackson <iwj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 13:14:00 +0100
- Cc: Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>, Bertrand Marquis <Bertrand.Marquis@xxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Rahul Singh <rahul.singh@xxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>, Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>, Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Volodymyr Babchuk <Volodymyr_Babchuk@xxxxxxxx>, Andre Przywara <Andre.Przywara@xxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 12:14:09 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
Julien Grall writes ("Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] arm/libxl: Emulated PCI device tree
node in libxl [and 1 more messages]"):
> Long term, I would expect a similar check to be necessary to set the
> vCPI flag at the domain creation. So it would be best to introduce an
> internal field 'vpci' to avoid duplicating that check. (Note I am not
> requesting this change for Xen 4.16).
Yes, I agree with all of that.
Ian.
|
